Global warming is a scientific theory with evidence supporitng come. Cap and trade and carbon taxes are not scientific theorys , which are the controls and taxes . Who here believes in global warming , but think cap and trade or carbon taxes that are junk or not make a difference , have a major negative impact on the world, or worse ? Who thinks it's time to separate the two ?
that is why we are n0bama pis.sed ? http://www.jammiewf.com/2011/thug-life-o
Ethics of global warming, the pig and the benefits By Paul Driessen web posted February 12, 2007 The ink is barely dry on the new code of conduct, and Congress is already redefining ethics and pork to fit a global warming agenda. As Will Rogers observed, "with Congress, every time they make a joke it's a law. And every time they make a law it's a joke." However, life-altering, economy wrecking climate bills are no laughing matter. That's why we have to recognize that the Kyoto Protocol and the legislative proposals of "climate protection" will not stabilize the climate, even if CO2 is the culprit. That's why we must recognize that the money to be made, and power to be gained, from climate alarmism and symbolism is one of the main reasons that many are getting on the climate "consensus" bandwagon. In accusing ExxonMobil of giving "more than $ 19 billion since the end of 1990" to public policy institutes that promote climate holocaust "denial," Senate Inquisitors Olympia Snowe slandered and Jay Rockefeller of both donor and recipient. Moreover, this is less than half of the Pew Charitable Trusts and allied foundations contributed to the Pew Center on Climate Change during the same period only. It is a pittance compared to what U.S. environmental groups spent propagating climate chaos scare stories. This amounts to 30 cents for every $ 1,000 that the U.S., EU and UN spent since 1993 (some $ 80 billion in total) in the global research warming catastrophe. And ignores the fact that Exxon grants also supported malaria control, economic development in the Third World and many other efforts. Aside from honest, if unfounded, fears of climate disasters, why could support other climate alarmism? Scientists using climate change to explain environmental changes improve your chances of getting research grants from foundations, corporations
Are you sitting ? Well , here's the bomb. The volcanic eruption in Iceland , since its first spewing of volcanic ash has , in just four days, negated every effort made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you . Of course you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it
Are you sitting down? Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland, since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you. Of course you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it
John McCain has proposed a " cap and trade " system for carbon as a means to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and address global warming . What do you think about the proposal ? Sources: http://www.ucsusa.org/ssi/climate_change
Health Care Tax will fail, yet another attempt by the administration. backdoor us on taxes , Democrats . always love the form of taxes and beg when we're not even looking .
Any person who makes the connection : carbon taxes apparently not designed to reduce pollution , but to redistribute wealth in the world . To offset trade imbalances / deficit countries with fewer resources are turning to carbon taxes ponzi scheme to reduce the cost of importing foreign goods / raw materials ( steel, oil , coal , etc ) - what do you think ?
Is the real reason for global warming to tax you and me ? When Big Oil tax that trickles down to what you pay at the pump . $ 12 per gallon of gasoline prices.would this poor wounded people
So what 's the big plan here ? An emissions trading system that the transfer of money (in the form of loans ) from developed countries to developing countries such as Russia (which has no industry to speak of other natural resource extraction and weapons systems ) that are not contaminated IN THE FIRST PLACE ? In what sense ? Or any proposal to cut CO2 ? With small declines some with large increases in other countries makes sense right? * There should be a mandatory trip to China and India for anyone who feels this issue is important , it is unthinkable pollution there, experience it in person ! I could not see across the street in Beijing on windless days , India is not much better . A comprehensive plan worldwide to reduce CO2 emissions must include the countries , so it is not a joke. Why is nuclear power so terrible that we want less emissions right? Why the U.S. want to damage our economy , China 2 watches pollute and prosper , we need a better plan